“My Name is Morgan Freeberg and I’m a Sarah Palin Fan”
My name is Morgan K. Freeberg and I’m a blogger.
Hi, Morgan!
Also — as of today — I am going back to being a Sarah Palin fan. Today concludes an experiment I have been doing. More on that below.
I’m the founder, CEO, chief fry cook & bottle-washer at House of Eratosthenes, colloquially known as The Blog That Nobody Reads. There is a reason why we have named ourselves after a guy who lived twenty-two centuries ago; it has to do with a measurement produced by that ancient, accurately stating the circumference of the Earth.
Now, you know how liberal college professors like to say something like “we don’t teach ‘em what to think here, we teach ‘em how to think?” And then it turns out to be a load of crap, of course. Well, our name is all about borrowing a page from that book. See, to live two centuries before Christ and conduct such an exercise without the benefit of space ships or satellites or really long tape measures or really tall ladders, you can’t be thinking just any ol’ way.
But if you think the right way, you can accomplish some amazing, mind-boggling things. Even without the space ships, satellites, tape measures or ladders.
Today, we live with some powerful influences that dissuade us from thinking in this productive way; and, because of this, meaningful achievements are beyond our reach as a society, beyond even our vision of what might be possible, that ought to be well within our grasp. I believe in this matter regarding the former Governor of Alaska, our situation is roughly akin to a man struggling to recover a grasp on the edge of a cliff as he dangles over an abyss, rejecting the efforts of one rescuer, frantically searching for some other who has yet to materialize. It’s as if he’s saying “no, I don’t want some pretty woman rescuing me, I’d rather fall.”
Many’s the time I’ve heard a Palin hater say “I don’t have a better candidate in mind, but I’m hoping one will emerge.”
Their thinking is that she will screw this whole thing up. Nominate Palin, they say, and it’s four more years of Obama — guaranteed. This is because she’s some kind of a “lightweight.” Well, how do we know she’s a lightweight? And here is where the thinking falls apart; this is where it is shown to be a different brand of thinking, than that which can figure out the size of the Earth two centuries BC. We know she’s a lightweight because…we just do. Because that’s what everybody says. Bandwagon fallacy all the way down the line. Also: These stories just keep coming out over and over again. Bad decisions that she made. Television interviews handled ineptly. Things she doesn’t know about world history.
It’s only when you
1) Dig down into the details of the stories as they come out, and
2) Activate and maintain your long-term memory, remembering what really happened
…that you can make the determination: Just about everything that suggests it’s beyond Sarah Palin’s ability to handle something, is a crock, or is based on something that is a crock. I say “just about” because, like anybody else, Palin does have some fails. However, I have noticed a great majority of these fails have occurred within those very few weeks that she was a VP candidate, within a campaign that was not handled by her. In fact, that campaign was handled by people who weren’t fond of her. See, again: details. If they change the situation, then it’s worth knowing what they are.
People who hate Sarah Palin, or think she’s likely to fail, don’t know her. They’re ignorant. I don’t mean that as an insult, I mean it as a neutral observation of fact. I ask them if they’ve read any of her books, which are not priced out of the market; in this Age of Amazon, they are readily available and can be had for a song. The answer always comes back toward the negative, and furthermore, they haven’t taken the opportunity to hear her side of the story about anything. I quote them things from her books, and for this, they make fun of me. That’s their response to everything, to make fun. And at that point, I have to ask: Does it even matter what facts they do have & don’t have, if they think like lunatics?
We live in a universe that is logical, which means you can measure the size of planets by peeking into water wells. It is a truly amazing universe. But it doesn’t permit you to know anything worth knowing, if you think in a diseased way with the “I laugh at it, it therefore becomes untrue” technique. In this universe, you have to think like a responsible grown-up before you can know anything.
In keeping with that, though, one week ago I recognized that I need to live up to my own hype. That meant conducting some honest experiments, evaluating the strength of positions I didn’t find palatable, and it also meant being receptive to the outcome, whatever it might be. The Palin haters have all these arguments to present about her various deficiencies that have to do with — that rely completely upon — third parties. These people won’t approve of you if you like Palin. Those people over there will be convinced you’re as stupid as she is, if you support her. She will lose the election. If she is nominated no one will show up to vote and Obama will get a second term.
Nobody seems to be able to find something wrong with her, it seems, without speaking out in proxy for somebody else.
So I decided to put it to a test. Does liking Palin have an effect on what others think? Can I win some new friends, maybe, by renouncing Palin and making it known that I am open to another candidate?
Therefore, I put up a post last weekend declaring that I am no longer a Palin fan. I linked to it on Facebook, so that people there would know I am now a reasonable, intellectual, respectable human being who doesn’t like Sarah Palin. On June 4 I joined the swelled ranks of people who don’t have the slightest clue who the nominee should be, but gosh darn it it can’t be her! Judging by how much talking they do and how loud they are, it seems to be a big group.
Also, I put together a list of requirements of what we are looking for, for this candidate who is more acceptable than the Governor. I came up with twenty-five. It ended up being a very silly list, because I based it on these various complaints I’ve been hearing that supposedly make her unacceptable. Requirement Number One is that the “good candidate” should be a man, or a woman who is very ugly. Obviously, pretty women, for some reason that I have yet to understand, are absolutely unacceptable.
Today ends the experiment. I am ready to announce the results.
Number of new friends: ZERO.
Number of honest compliments I have received, for seeing the light that Palin is unacceptable: ZERO.
Number of new additions that have been recommended for my silly list of candidate requirements: ZERO.
Number of corrections I have received for silly requirements on my silly list that shouldn’t be there: ZERO.
Number of likes on my Facebook posting: ONE…not from a Palin hater, but from a Palin fan, who I suspect saw the irony of what I was doing. So I guess that wouldn’t count.
Number of friends I expect to lose by liking Sarah Palin again: ZERO. Hey, I try to think like Eratosthenes, but I’m still human. We all like to see the world through rose-colored glasses.
Conclusion to my experiment? I wouldn’t be able to avoid this even if I wanted to: Palin haters don’t care about the Republicans nominating a “better candidate” who would “stand a better chance” or who might be missing “all this baggage.” They don’t care about any of that; it’s all a smoke screen. They don’t have any new ideas to offer here and they won’t have any.
They are a bunch of bitter scolds. Nothing more. They just like to bitch and complain. Probably because of what Palin reminds us of, every time we think about her. They find all that stuff unpleasing so they make fun of it, in hopes that it goes away. It is no more complicated than that.
I suspected that much before. Now that I have taken my one-week sabbatical from being a Palin fan, I know for sure.
I know for sure because I thought like Eratosthenes. Now I will grant you that this it outside of my field of expertise; a professional software engineer in Sacramento really doesn’t have any business trying to figure out who does & doesn’t have a chance in a presidential election. But then again, a library administrator in Alexandria doesn’t have any business figuring out the size of the Earth.
I don’t perceive things to form opinions that will win me friends. No responsible thinking adult does; not with the questions that really matter. It’s got to do with how you think when you gamble the first of your million dollars, versus how you do your thinking as you gamble with your last dollar. Well, even if you do like to think with bandwagon fallacy, like you have a million bets you can afford to lose, and form your inferences to make friends — guess what? You can’t make friends this way. I’m not speculating on this. I gave it a more than fair try. Someone get the word to the Republican delegates?
My name is Morgan K. Freeberg and I’m a Palin fan.
And yes, as a matter of fact, I am serious, and I do know what I’m doing. I know that much very well, thank you. I made sure.
Cross-posted at House of Eratosthenes, Brutally Honest and Right Wing News.





[...] Cross-posted at Brutally Honest, Right Wing News and Washington Rebel. [...]
Nice job. Those of us who are behind the Divine Ms. P (and studly Mr. P as well) take continuing delight in the pathetic efforts of Republican candidates who rise up and shoot themselves in the head almost immediately. (I mean this figuratively, of course, more’s the pity.)
There is Newt (buy my DVD) Gingrich. There is Herman (RKBA is a state choice) Cain. There is Mitt (yeah, I am a Mormon, what’s it to you) Romney. There is Michelle (teaser) Bachmann. And all the others in the pathetic lineup.
I’m am not even going to comment on the craziness of Rick Perry who would rather be President of a bankrupt, failing country than the Governor of a state that is poised to be the nucleus of the New United States. I can only hope that his toying with a presidential run is merely a mechanism to achieve more national recognition as he pulls together a red state coalition to secede. Does that make me crazy? Perhaps, but one has to dream big. (And now that Ms. P is an Arizona resident, we might let her be Secretary of State of the NUS. Alaska is too remote to play … inner lines, ya know.)
As if to prove my point, we have the battle of the empty suits …
Linked: ‘Rule 5 ‘Breastaurants’ Update!’
I had a long conversation with a conservative (independent) black friend of mine here in Western Montana. He asked why no one has mentioned Condoleezza Rice’s name in connection with possible Republican candidates for 2012. I thought this was an excellent question. She has always seemed to me to be a very intelligent lady with great integrity and honesty, and she would bring great foreign policy experience to any ticket, perhaps as a VP. Palin and Rice, Bachmann and Rice, West and Rice? If you feel this has any validity, perhaps you can do as I am trying to do, and bring her name to the forefront of thought for consideration. If there are serious doctrinal reasons for not considering her, I’d like to hear those as well.
You might google “Condoleezza Rice RINO” and see what you get. The woman is bright and thoughtful, but she is not as lib-con as I would like my president to be. She is certainly more centrist than any of the other three you mention, Palin, West, or Bachmann. Perhaps working in the State department has made her incapable of plain speaking compared to the others (and her takedown of O’Donnell was fine), but I don’t think we can expect the required radicalism from Ms. Rice. Compared to John Bolton, for example, she is completely squishy on foreign affairs.
My ticket … West and Bachmann. Wait for the first leftist to call him an Oreo and you won’t believe what happens then.
Equally good would be the babe ticket … Palin and Bachmann. That would flush out the feminists as leftists first and pro-women second. If we have to have a 19th amendment, let’s really test it.
Uncle Kenny,
I like your picks, too. I was thinking that having Rice as a VP might gather more of the black vote than a white-on-white choice like Palin/Bachmann – even though I too like that match. West/Bachmann would take care of that, and I’d certainly support that. He sounds sincere when he speaks on the Second Amendment, and he certainly is squared away on the muslim issue.
It would be great to have a patriotic, intelligent, and honest black man as President to take the bad taste of Obama away, and hopefully drag America back from the brink of destruction. Although I think we are facing some hard times no matter who gets elected.
I don’t want my President to bring truckloads and truckloads of “argument-winning” power. Regardless of party, it seems whenever we seek out individuals who possess superlative manifestations of that talent, it seems we consistently end up with people who can’t or won’t discuss things rationally — since why would they have ever had to? And the end result is what we’re looking at right now. We just saw it with that stupid “reinvestment act” with the shovel-ready projects…the pitch is, put all this money into a great big pot and my friends will be able to make some money off the top…that will solve the problem.
It ends up being literally a punchline: http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2011/06/obama-shovel-ready-was-not-as-uh-shovel.html
If you’re out looking for a job right now, I’ll bet you find that to be a real fucking thigh-slapper. Yuk, yuk.
We just got sold a $787 billion bundle of crap. That’s what the President’s job is right now — we might as well write it right into Article II of the Constitution. When you elect a President because of some very narrow range of talents, you re-define the presidency as an office where that is done. So that’s where we are in AD 2011. The President is a guy who’s supposed to sell things to the country that are bad for it. The country has asked to be poisoned.
I’d rather have a straw and burlap dummy behind that desk. It wouldn’t be any fun to watch and it wouldn’t be good at winning arguments with anybody. But it I’ll bet it would be easier to find a job while the straw dummy is President.
It’s not clear to me where you are going with that, Morgan. I don’t think Mr. Obama has ever engaged in an argument with anyone, let alone won one. In effect, you have your straw dummy as President right now. His primary achievement … letting his coat tails fill the Congress with Democrats and signing the resulting horrible bills. His secondary achievement … pissing off everyone he talks with, probably including our enemies, although they won’t say so. His legacy … the first president who is, personally, a complete charmless asshole.
Personally, I don’t think there is very much the next president will be able to do to fix what’s broken, but I do expect him, or her, to explain to the American people what needs to to be done and why. Churchill is perhaps the best role model of the kind of leadership we need. Is that winning arguments by your definition?
Well, I have written before that there are actually two ways of doing what we call “winning an argument.”
http://www.peekinthewell.net/blog/yin-and-yang-v/
You can do it the way you and I are accustomed to talking about it…the classic Greek-philosopher way, in which points have meaning, therefore they are capable of trouncing other points, and in turn being called into question or refuted altogether by counterpoints.
And then there is the “I’m getting the vibe” way. Just making a better impression, nevermind whether you successfully create logical challenges or successfully respond to them. See: Joe Biden “won” the debate with Sarah Palin, as we all knew he would.
I’m referring to the lazy-brained, fuzzy-headed, second way of winning arguments. The peanut gallery decrees you won because there’s just something about you.
So where I’m going with it is: Elections in America have diminished into regularly spaced contests in which it’s decided who among us, for the next two to four years, is going to get EVERYTHING they want and feel NO pain. As long as the victor of these contests is the guy who is strongest at winning arguments that second, childhood-thinking, intellectually-flaccid way…that’s going to be the definition, that’s going to be the result. And it’s very expensive. Making sure some designated demographic is pain-free, no matter what happens, costs a whole lot of money. This country doesn’t have it.