15 May 2012
OK, that may seem a little silly, but hear me out. We are not just in a fight for liberty and the founding principles. We are in an existential fight for all of Western Civilization. Sure, it would be nice to rollback 100 years of progressive nonsense and return to our (possibly imagined) Constitutional roots, but there’s more than that. Between the collectivists and the muslims, millenia of civilization (back to Homer, kids) are in …
12 May 2012
It’s terribly unfortunate that, out of an entire four-year cycle of politics, we’ve not seen the national economy recover in any substantial way. That’s a long time for it to be languishing the way it’s been. But it affords us a unique educational opportunity because we’ve been able to watch two presidential administrations — one archetypically liberal, running for re-election, and the other one whatever passes for “conservative” in this day & age, and not …
6 May 2012
When it comes to Kerodin’s Convention in DC, I am in. From the first day they passed the seat belt law in Colorado, 1986, or thereabouts, I knew it would come to this. I chaffed at the first sign of a government obsessed with my safety and knew that one day it would grow to the point that something would have to be done about it. It never stops at common sense, once they snare you …
5 May 2012
Constitutional scholars do not impress me. I have listened to any number of them, including Representative Trey Gowdy, who recently ripped Kathleen Sebelius over the Obamacare issue. Okay, that was good and I enjoyed this video of the confrontation. Refreshing as it was, and instructive on the absolute ignorance of the Constitution and the Supreme Court and any measure of weighing Constitutionality against a bill put before congress that the Obama Administration has, even at the …
1 May 2012
Today the world is different. Our nation is different. As Americans we are being pulled in different directions, called on by society to remain silent and acquiescent to the great ramrod of collectivism, or asked to risk everything for principles and ideals that are at the heart of Americanism, but no longer supported by our government(s). Indeed, to demand that the government recognize and operate under these very ideals upon which it is based is considered …
30 Apr 2012
Now here is a picture that’s worth a zillion words… Look what’s going on there now. Green line is retraction incidents, measured in “notices” per 100,000 publications in scientific journals. Now, you could argue there may be problems with measuring it this way…but nevertheless, if the plotting is shaped like this, it’s gotta mean something. And the line more or less gels with public perception of the problems with science across time, if it doesn’t …
13 Apr 2012
Here’s the problem as I see it, whenever I attempt to communicate some ideas to the readers of this blog, I run into a problem. It is not that Romney supports guns and Obama wants to take them away, it is that every politician wants to take them away, either from an ideological police state mentality, or from a law and order, “make it safer for our guys, the government guys”, point of view. Does …
10 Apr 2012
The announcement of Santorum only confirms what we all knew, that no matter who got the GOP nomination there would be a big-government liberal in the White House after the 2012 election. The announcement only sets the field. Santorum would have been no different, in my estimation, none of them would. I know I have been through this before, but there is no, none, zero chance that any government stooge will ever do anything to …
7 Apr 2012
So the kid’s here for spring break, of which today is the last day. The fiancee and I are driving him back to Nevada today so he can resume school. We had a blast with the go-karts and the trip to the shooting range, where I lost my .40 S&W virginity and managed a decently tight grouping in spite of the wicked recoil on the Beretta. Also upgraded his home-built with a new 2GB video …
5 Apr 2012
It occurs to me that the best of us seek the justification of the Constitution to act, to not appear lawless and out of control. We seek some sort of sanctification, legitimization in our desire for liberty. We are not unreasonable about this, we don’t demand the destruction of our government, only that it would work the way it has promised to work. We want to be able to count on something. In the face of that …
I totally agree. Muslims can no longer be allowed to emigrate into the West. Muslim birth rates in the UK are 8 children per couple versus 1.6 per couple for Anglo-Saxons. We are letting our enemies become the majority and then they will make Hitler’s holocaust look like a children’s birthday party. We have to deport them all now. AND before you think I am a crazed jackass – I am a middle aged physician who has seen his home city in the UK COMPLETELY displaced of white people. Sharia courts operate ion the UK. Time is ticking away. I think America has a small chance to preserve the Western way of life, half of continental Europe will be Islamic States in a decade.
Thanks for your comment. I’ve been curious about how Britons view this and, of course, read some nationalist blogs that show many are on the qui vive, not to mention just outright alarmed. On the other hand, I read about the West Midland Police and see videos of Bobbies acting like mindless servants to the Muslims. The overall demographic situation is dire and I can only conclude that the concentration of Muslims is such as to spare many other areas. For now. One poignant account I read described how a native Briton threaded his way to work on the streets of London and moved in a sea of faces of people who were immigrants. It’s as though he wasn’t even in his own country any longer.
I live in an area of the U.S. that has only a tiny Muslim presence and the people I meet are far from energized on the issue of immigration, let alone Muslim immigration. Still, any one of a 10,000 insufferable Muslim acts or words are enough to shift me permanently into the “not now not ever” mode of thinking but the vast majority of people I encounter just don’t react. Defeats of immigration/amnesty in Congress are hardly decisive, require excessive efforts to pressure legislators, and never send pro-immigration politicians home to shame and electoral defeat.
There simply is no greater retrograde force than Islam as Mr. Churchill observed. Yet it is precisely Muslim immigrants that Western governments import by then ton and fawn over. I find it similarly puzzling why U.S. business should have ignored India as a place to move their off shore operations. Is India not a peaceful democracy inhabited by huge numbers of intelligent, English-speaking people? Why, yes it is. Then why did we choose instead to favor China, which has a difficult language and is a communist dictatorship, strategic competitor, ardent supporter of N. Korea and Iran, and one-time battlefield opponent?
I don’t know what it will take for Westerners to rouse themselves to defend themselves. There is no possibility whatsoever of the West ever being able to live peacefully with Muslims within its borders. Muslims will never, repeat, never bring themselves to integrate. They will never abandon their bizarre beliefs and pathetic “legal” system. For now, Westerners doze on despite storm petrels that blot out the sun.
[...] is covering Big Sis and the border. Trestin has his predictions for 2011. Washington Rebel has Peace through Surrender. Woodsterman has a funny video. Wyblog has some ObamaCare damage. Zilla of the Resistance has [...]
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Md.Obydur Rahman and Irish Cicero. Irish Cicero said: Peace through surrender. http://ping.fm/SH3e3 [...]
From Simple Life Complexities blog
http://simplelifecomplexities.blogspot.com/
Sunday, January 2, 2011
The profound problem of Muslim immigration
“It shows how even the a larger number of Muslims that move, are unwittingly gathered in back to Islam so intergration can not happen or best is temporary.”
• The profound problem of Muslim immigration
EuropeNews December 26 2010
Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration
Sam Solomon & Elias Al Maqdisi ANM Publishers, 2009, 139 pp., $14.95
By Henrik R. Clausen
“As the West has accepted extensive immigration from Islamic countries, unexpected social and political problems have followed. While rising crime rates, rampant unemployment and a heavy load on our much-appreciated welfare systems are severe problems in itself, a distinct and dramatically more significant problem is the subtle subversion of our free and democratic societies, also known as “Stealth Jihad”.
The retired Islamic scholar Sam Solomon, in this compact book “Al-Hijra, The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration”, connects the dots and explains why seemingly unrelated incidents are in fact rooted in Islamic tradition and are steps on the path to create a fully Islamized society.”
You will also find:- “Muslims and Westerners: The Psychological Differences”
Thursday, 09 December 2010 17:51By Nicolai Sennels
You might also be interested in the Austrian MP Ewald Stadler’s speech to parliament as I endeavoured to get more of his speech (not video) in English translation and with helpful context and comments from other bloggers.
I hope you do not mind me putting these
They both give a real deep understanding of the coming problem and with out being “over the top”. “first recognize your enemy and his objectives” and we have been so slow, being buried by “political correctness”, “multi cultural” and etc to bury the truth.
Thank you for earlier hat-tip on “A complete list of things caused by global warming”
Simpleton
Thank you for taking the trouble to list those references. The demographic bomb ticks away but Westerners insist to this very moment in acting the frog in the kettle. I think it must have been the same with the Jews when the police came for them in their homes. Even at that very last instant they went quietly, still not capable of imagining the mortal danger they were in. They at least had something of an excuse. They were not awash in a media flood and the Nazi intentions were not as readily apparent then as we might suppose.
I am sure you are aware of this excerpt from former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne’s speech at the U.N. In 1974:
“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”
You’re welcome for the hat tip. It’s a terribly clever idea to collect all those “effects” of GW. It’s like the list some equally clever person put together of “Things That Irritate Muslims.” However, I don’t think he use the word “irritate.”
There is a small thing that many can do and even if the ridicule is very subtle and mild, as Molly Norris found, it is an awareness that can be built on like a snow ball.
We must NOT FORGET or loose“Every body Draw Muhammed Day” May 20th for 2011.
Maybe others are already onto it and something can be put as a reminder tag on blogs for that date?
It will also be in memory of the effects of islamic muslim terror impinging on the “life of Molly Norris”, in a “western” country, the USA.and Self censoring South Park.
Danish Cartoons and the sacrifices of elderly Kurt Westergaard also in hiding, as Swedish man Lars Vilks.
I guess not only on internet, Copies can be made and printed for notice boards etc. so I guess the “hate crimes” will go up many 1000′s of % and and a “kind explanation” derived from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day which shows the history and players which will also educate others (as the nonsensical nashing of teeth response will confirm).
It will allow others to know that they are not the only ones to feel a concern at the loss of rights and understanding that there is a problem, even if they can not put a finger on it, or articulate it well.
You did say Irritate, (I guess confirmation will simply happen
) and I just think it will be really educational to all 
, and after all maintaining free speech in your “living foundational documents” is so important.! ! !
I hope it makes sense as my tongue is in my cheek as I type this.
So all be careful out there